Research about HOMEBUILDERS

Research about HOMEBUILDERS® and Programs that have replicated HOMEBUILDERS®

StudyResearch DesignOutcomes
Blythe, B. J. & Jayaratne, S. (1999). Michigan families first effectiveness study: A summary of findings. Report submitted to the State of Michigan, Family Independence AgencyRandom assignment control group design.

Placement prevention at 12 months after services.
93% of the treatment group avoided placement.

43% of the control group avoided placement.
Fraser, M. W., Pecora, P. J., & Haapala, D. A. (1991). Families in Crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Quasi-experimental longitudinal design, with overflow comparison group in Utah.

Placement prevention at 12 months after intake (approximately 11 months after services).
71% of Washington treatment group; and 62% of Utah treatment group avoided placement.

15% of comparison group avoided placement.
Fraser, M., Walton, E., Lewis, R., Pecora, P., & Walton, W. (1996). An experiment in family reunification services: Correlates of outcomes at one year follow up. Children and Youth Services Review, 18 (4/5), 335-361Random assignment control group design.

Reunification rate at 12 months after services.
92% of the treatment group returned home.

28% of the control group returned home.
Kirk R.S. & Griffith, D.P. (2008). Impact of intensive family preservation services on disproportionality in one state’s child welfare system. Child Welfare, 87(5), 87-105.Retrospective design.81% of treatment group avoided placement.

51% to 61% of comparison group avoided placement.
Kirk, R. S & Griffith, D. P. (2004). Intensive family preservation services: Demonstrating placement prevention using event history analysis. Social Work Research, 28(1), 5-18.Retrospective design.

Placement prevention rate at 12 months after services.
81% of treatment group avoided placement.

51% to 61% of comparison group avoided placement.
Morris, E., Suarez, L. & Reid, J. C. (1997). Behavioral outcomes of home-based services for children and adolescents with serious emotional disorders. Family Preservation Journal, 2(2), 21-32.Quasi-experimental, one group, pre-test, post-test designDecreases in mental health symptoms – externalizing and internalizing child behavior problems:
Oppositional Defiant Disorder; Mood
Disorders; Conduct Disorders (aggressive and delinquent behavior)
Walton, E. (1998). In-home family-focused reunification: A six-year follow-up of a successful experiment. Social Work Research, 22, 205-214.Random assignment control group design.

Reunification rate at 12 months after services.
92% of the treatment group returned home.

28% of the control group returned home.

Differences in reunification were maintained at a six year follow-up.
Wood, S., Barton, K., & Schroeder, C. (1988). In-home treatment of abusive families: Cost and placement at one year. Psychotherapy 24(3), 409-414.Placement prevention at 12 months after

Overflow comparison group.
74% of the treatment group avoided placement.

45% of the comparison group avoided placement.